Review



mesh geometry  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc mesh geometry
    Mesh Geometry, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mesh geometry/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mesh geometry - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    model geometry and mesh  (COMSOL Inc)
    90
    COMSOL Inc model geometry and mesh
    Model Geometry And Mesh, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/model geometry and mesh/product/COMSOL Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    model geometry and mesh - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    3d meshes from 2d geometries  (Altair Engineering Inc)
    90
    Altair Engineering Inc 3d meshes from 2d geometries
    3d Meshes From 2d Geometries, supplied by Altair Engineering Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/3d meshes from 2d geometries/product/Altair Engineering Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    3d meshes from 2d geometries - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    volume mesh geometry  (Abaqus Inc)
    90
    Abaqus Inc volume mesh geometry
    Volume Mesh Geometry, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/volume mesh geometry/product/Abaqus Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    volume mesh geometry - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    meshed biventricular cardiac geometries  (Dassault Systemes)
    90
    Dassault Systemes meshed biventricular cardiac geometries
    a) Short- and long-axis views of <t>biventricular</t> meshed geometries of six PPCM patients illustrating the wall thickness of the left and right ventricular free wall and septal wall. In each image, the LV is on the right, and the RV is on the left. Recovery status (R: recovered, N: not recovered), ejection fraction, and survival status (A: alive and D: died) are indicated in the patient code. b) Comparison of the calibrated passive filling curves for each patient. Volume was normalised to unloaded volume V 0 . Compliance of the LV myocardium increased with increase in ejection fraction (numerical value in the model’s name). Model N06D with the lowest ejection fraction of 6% had the stiffest LV myocardium. c) Schematic of coupling of biventricular geometry with circulatory system and LVAD ( Sack et al ., 2018b ). R M : mitral valve resistance, R A : aortic valve resistance, C SA : systemic arterial compliance, R SYS : systemic arterial resistance, C SV : systemic venous compliance, R T: tricuspid valve resistance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C PA : pulmonary arterial compliance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C P : pulmonary system compliance, LVAD: left ventricular assist device.
    Meshed Biventricular Cardiac Geometries, supplied by Dassault Systemes, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/meshed biventricular cardiac geometries/product/Dassault Systemes
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    meshed biventricular cardiac geometries - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    geometry and mesh  (ANSYS inc)
    90
    ANSYS inc geometry and mesh
    a) Short- and long-axis views of <t>biventricular</t> meshed geometries of six PPCM patients illustrating the wall thickness of the left and right ventricular free wall and septal wall. In each image, the LV is on the right, and the RV is on the left. Recovery status (R: recovered, N: not recovered), ejection fraction, and survival status (A: alive and D: died) are indicated in the patient code. b) Comparison of the calibrated passive filling curves for each patient. Volume was normalised to unloaded volume V 0 . Compliance of the LV myocardium increased with increase in ejection fraction (numerical value in the model’s name). Model N06D with the lowest ejection fraction of 6% had the stiffest LV myocardium. c) Schematic of coupling of biventricular geometry with circulatory system and LVAD ( Sack et al ., 2018b ). R M : mitral valve resistance, R A : aortic valve resistance, C SA : systemic arterial compliance, R SYS : systemic arterial resistance, C SV : systemic venous compliance, R T: tricuspid valve resistance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C PA : pulmonary arterial compliance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C P : pulmonary system compliance, LVAD: left ventricular assist device.
    Geometry And Mesh, supplied by ANSYS inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/geometry and mesh/product/ANSYS inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    geometry and mesh - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    2d geometry meshing  (COMSOL Inc)
    90
    COMSOL Inc 2d geometry meshing
    a) Short- and long-axis views of <t>biventricular</t> meshed geometries of six PPCM patients illustrating the wall thickness of the left and right ventricular free wall and septal wall. In each image, the LV is on the right, and the RV is on the left. Recovery status (R: recovered, N: not recovered), ejection fraction, and survival status (A: alive and D: died) are indicated in the patient code. b) Comparison of the calibrated passive filling curves for each patient. Volume was normalised to unloaded volume V 0 . Compliance of the LV myocardium increased with increase in ejection fraction (numerical value in the model’s name). Model N06D with the lowest ejection fraction of 6% had the stiffest LV myocardium. c) Schematic of coupling of biventricular geometry with circulatory system and LVAD ( Sack et al ., 2018b ). R M : mitral valve resistance, R A : aortic valve resistance, C SA : systemic arterial compliance, R SYS : systemic arterial resistance, C SV : systemic venous compliance, R T: tricuspid valve resistance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C PA : pulmonary arterial compliance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C P : pulmonary system compliance, LVAD: left ventricular assist device.
    2d Geometry Meshing, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/2d geometry meshing/product/COMSOL Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    2d geometry meshing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    watertight geometry workflow of ansys fluent meshing  (ANSYS inc)
    90
    ANSYS inc watertight geometry workflow of ansys fluent meshing
    a) Short- and long-axis views of <t>biventricular</t> meshed geometries of six PPCM patients illustrating the wall thickness of the left and right ventricular free wall and septal wall. In each image, the LV is on the right, and the RV is on the left. Recovery status (R: recovered, N: not recovered), ejection fraction, and survival status (A: alive and D: died) are indicated in the patient code. b) Comparison of the calibrated passive filling curves for each patient. Volume was normalised to unloaded volume V 0 . Compliance of the LV myocardium increased with increase in ejection fraction (numerical value in the model’s name). Model N06D with the lowest ejection fraction of 6% had the stiffest LV myocardium. c) Schematic of coupling of biventricular geometry with circulatory system and LVAD ( Sack et al ., 2018b ). R M : mitral valve resistance, R A : aortic valve resistance, C SA : systemic arterial compliance, R SYS : systemic arterial resistance, C SV : systemic venous compliance, R T: tricuspid valve resistance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C PA : pulmonary arterial compliance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C P : pulmonary system compliance, LVAD: left ventricular assist device.
    Watertight Geometry Workflow Of Ansys Fluent Meshing, supplied by ANSYS inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/watertight geometry workflow of ansys fluent meshing/product/ANSYS inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    watertight geometry workflow of ansys fluent meshing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    mesh geometry  (MathWorks Inc)
    90
    MathWorks Inc mesh geometry
    a) Short- and long-axis views of <t>biventricular</t> meshed geometries of six PPCM patients illustrating the wall thickness of the left and right ventricular free wall and septal wall. In each image, the LV is on the right, and the RV is on the left. Recovery status (R: recovered, N: not recovered), ejection fraction, and survival status (A: alive and D: died) are indicated in the patient code. b) Comparison of the calibrated passive filling curves for each patient. Volume was normalised to unloaded volume V 0 . Compliance of the LV myocardium increased with increase in ejection fraction (numerical value in the model’s name). Model N06D with the lowest ejection fraction of 6% had the stiffest LV myocardium. c) Schematic of coupling of biventricular geometry with circulatory system and LVAD ( Sack et al ., 2018b ). R M : mitral valve resistance, R A : aortic valve resistance, C SA : systemic arterial compliance, R SYS : systemic arterial resistance, C SV : systemic venous compliance, R T: tricuspid valve resistance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C PA : pulmonary arterial compliance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C P : pulmonary system compliance, LVAD: left ventricular assist device.
    Mesh Geometry, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mesh geometry/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mesh geometry - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    meshed geometry of the pv/t system  (COMSOL Inc)
    90
    COMSOL Inc meshed geometry of the pv/t system
    a) Short- and long-axis views of <t>biventricular</t> meshed geometries of six PPCM patients illustrating the wall thickness of the left and right ventricular free wall and septal wall. In each image, the LV is on the right, and the RV is on the left. Recovery status (R: recovered, N: not recovered), ejection fraction, and survival status (A: alive and D: died) are indicated in the patient code. b) Comparison of the calibrated passive filling curves for each patient. Volume was normalised to unloaded volume V 0 . Compliance of the LV myocardium increased with increase in ejection fraction (numerical value in the model’s name). Model N06D with the lowest ejection fraction of 6% had the stiffest LV myocardium. c) Schematic of coupling of biventricular geometry with circulatory system and LVAD ( Sack et al ., 2018b ). R M : mitral valve resistance, R A : aortic valve resistance, C SA : systemic arterial compliance, R SYS : systemic arterial resistance, C SV : systemic venous compliance, R T: tricuspid valve resistance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C PA : pulmonary arterial compliance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C P : pulmonary system compliance, LVAD: left ventricular assist device.
    Meshed Geometry Of The Pv/T System, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/meshed geometry of the pv/t system/product/COMSOL Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    meshed geometry of the pv/t system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    three-dimensional geometries modeling and meshing software  (ANSYS inc)
    90
    ANSYS inc three-dimensional geometries modeling and meshing software
    a) Short- and long-axis views of <t>biventricular</t> meshed geometries of six PPCM patients illustrating the wall thickness of the left and right ventricular free wall and septal wall. In each image, the LV is on the right, and the RV is on the left. Recovery status (R: recovered, N: not recovered), ejection fraction, and survival status (A: alive and D: died) are indicated in the patient code. b) Comparison of the calibrated passive filling curves for each patient. Volume was normalised to unloaded volume V 0 . Compliance of the LV myocardium increased with increase in ejection fraction (numerical value in the model’s name). Model N06D with the lowest ejection fraction of 6% had the stiffest LV myocardium. c) Schematic of coupling of biventricular geometry with circulatory system and LVAD ( Sack et al ., 2018b ). R M : mitral valve resistance, R A : aortic valve resistance, C SA : systemic arterial compliance, R SYS : systemic arterial resistance, C SV : systemic venous compliance, R T: tricuspid valve resistance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C PA : pulmonary arterial compliance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C P : pulmonary system compliance, LVAD: left ventricular assist device.
    Three Dimensional Geometries Modeling And Meshing Software, supplied by ANSYS inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/three-dimensional geometries modeling and meshing software/product/ANSYS inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    three-dimensional geometries modeling and meshing software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a) Short- and long-axis views of biventricular meshed geometries of six PPCM patients illustrating the wall thickness of the left and right ventricular free wall and septal wall. In each image, the LV is on the right, and the RV is on the left. Recovery status (R: recovered, N: not recovered), ejection fraction, and survival status (A: alive and D: died) are indicated in the patient code. b) Comparison of the calibrated passive filling curves for each patient. Volume was normalised to unloaded volume V 0 . Compliance of the LV myocardium increased with increase in ejection fraction (numerical value in the model’s name). Model N06D with the lowest ejection fraction of 6% had the stiffest LV myocardium. c) Schematic of coupling of biventricular geometry with circulatory system and LVAD ( Sack et al ., 2018b ). R M : mitral valve resistance, R A : aortic valve resistance, C SA : systemic arterial compliance, R SYS : systemic arterial resistance, C SV : systemic venous compliance, R T: tricuspid valve resistance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C PA : pulmonary arterial compliance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C P : pulmonary system compliance, LVAD: left ventricular assist device.

    Journal: medRxiv

    Article Title: Patient-specific in silico prediction of outcomes of partial continuous-flow LVAD treatment in peripartum cardiomyopathy

    doi: 10.1101/2024.09.18.24313803

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a) Short- and long-axis views of biventricular meshed geometries of six PPCM patients illustrating the wall thickness of the left and right ventricular free wall and septal wall. In each image, the LV is on the right, and the RV is on the left. Recovery status (R: recovered, N: not recovered), ejection fraction, and survival status (A: alive and D: died) are indicated in the patient code. b) Comparison of the calibrated passive filling curves for each patient. Volume was normalised to unloaded volume V 0 . Compliance of the LV myocardium increased with increase in ejection fraction (numerical value in the model’s name). Model N06D with the lowest ejection fraction of 6% had the stiffest LV myocardium. c) Schematic of coupling of biventricular geometry with circulatory system and LVAD ( Sack et al ., 2018b ). R M : mitral valve resistance, R A : aortic valve resistance, C SA : systemic arterial compliance, R SYS : systemic arterial resistance, C SV : systemic venous compliance, R T: tricuspid valve resistance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C PA : pulmonary arterial compliance, R P : pulmonary valve resistance, C P : pulmonary system compliance, LVAD: left ventricular assist device.

    Article Snippet: The meshed biventricular cardiac geometries were imported into Abaqus CAE (Dassault Systèmes, Providence, USA).

    Techniques: Comparison

    Representative contour plots displaying the two main trends of the biventricular myofibre stress in PPCM with increasing LVAD speed at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES). (a) Model R45A illustrates the first trend with a decrease in myofibre stress with an increase in LVAD speed at end-diastole but an increase in myofibre stress from 8,000 to 12,000 rpm at end-systole. This was observed for models R45A and N39A. (b) Model N06D illustrates the second trend with a decrease in myofibre stress with increasing LVAD speed both at end-diastole and end-systole, observed for models R20A, N18A, N12A and N06D. (Contour plots for the other patients are displayed in supplemental Figure S1.

    Journal: medRxiv

    Article Title: Patient-specific in silico prediction of outcomes of partial continuous-flow LVAD treatment in peripartum cardiomyopathy

    doi: 10.1101/2024.09.18.24313803

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative contour plots displaying the two main trends of the biventricular myofibre stress in PPCM with increasing LVAD speed at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES). (a) Model R45A illustrates the first trend with a decrease in myofibre stress with an increase in LVAD speed at end-diastole but an increase in myofibre stress from 8,000 to 12,000 rpm at end-systole. This was observed for models R45A and N39A. (b) Model N06D illustrates the second trend with a decrease in myofibre stress with increasing LVAD speed both at end-diastole and end-systole, observed for models R20A, N18A, N12A and N06D. (Contour plots for the other patients are displayed in supplemental Figure S1.

    Article Snippet: The meshed biventricular cardiac geometries were imported into Abaqus CAE (Dassault Systèmes, Providence, USA).

    Techniques: